Agents that answer from your own records, and say so when they cannot.
The model is the easy part. The records are the hard part. Ten years of Zendesk tickets where the useful answer is in the third reply of a merged thread. Call recordings where the account number is said twice, differently. A product catalogue with four SKUs for one product. Internal documentation that was last true before the reorganisation. We build the retrieval layer over that: chunking that respects where a document actually ends, an embedding index and a keyword index because neither is enough alone, metadata filters so a question about the current contract is not answered from the one it replaced. Every answer cites the passage it came from. When retrieval finds nothing good, the agent says so, in words, and hands off to a person.
A confident answer from the wrong document is the failure that reaches a customer with your name on it. It is the one we design against first, and the one the evaluation set is built to catch. If your records cannot support what you want to ask of them, we say so at the scoping stage, before anyone has paid for the attempt.
- Runs against
- Zendesk, Intercom and Freshdesk exports. Call recordings and their transcripts. Confluence, Notion, SharePoint, Google Drive. Product catalogues. Internal PDFs and spreadsheets.
- You get
- The agent as a service in your cloud account. The ingestion pipeline that keeps it current. An evaluation set built from your real questions, with the wrong answers marked. A review screen that shows what it said, what it cited, and where it declined.